What we eat for lunch in the cafeteria and buy in the supermarket for dinner depends on the order in which the dishes are presented to us, and how easy it is to get to the products. This is the conclusion of a collaborative review of existing research at the Faculty of Science – University of Copenhagen.
Is it possible to change our behavior when it comes to food choices only by presenting the food to the guests in a cafeteria in a different order, or by making it more difficult to reach the less healthy food? Yes, a review of existing research in this area concludes. The review shows that manipulation of food product order or proximity can influence food choice and that healthy food nudging seems promising. Eighteen studies were included in the review. Sixteen of the studies showed nudging made a positive impact.
“The review confirmed our expectation that there are very few scientific works available which deal with nudging healthier food choices by changes in the position of the food offers. We also corroborated that changing the organization of buffets, supermarkets and the other environments where people come across food can contribute to people eating more healthily,” said Associate Professor Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto from the Department of Food Science at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Using the methods of the private sector Nudging or “choice architecture” refers to strategic changes in the environment that are anticipated to alter people’s behavior in a predictable way, without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives. However, until now the scientific evidence of nudging towards healthier eating has been scarce.
“The food service operators and the retail sector have been using the principles of nudging to push its products to the consumers e.g. placing specific products at adult’s eye level, while other products are left at children’s eye level. The question is whether we can also use this simple and low-cost method to move people’s food behavior in a more healthy direction, or to facilitate the choice of healthier options” said Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto.
Other studies suggest that even a small move towards healthier eating has an impact on the health and life expectancy of a population.
“Some can start by eating more vegetables. Some will go from zero to one portion a day, and it will contribute in the long run. Those are studies from the medical world that inspire the idea of small changes having impact in public health, so how can you translate that knowledge into practical food service? Based on the review we suggest that a way ahead contributing to achieve public health goals through the food service sector is e.g. by making changes in the placement of the products we want to promote, like vegetables by putting them first in line. Likewise, by making it a little bit more difficult to reach the products that should be consumed with moderation or that should be strictly limited like some products of animal origin or highly processed foods,” said Dr. Perez-Cueto.
Healthy food nudging in the coming years
He expects food nudging in cafeterias to be one of the hot topics when it comes to interventions aimed at promoting healthy eating habits.
“There is already some activity in the area, and changing eating towards healthier behavior is going to be the challenge for the next couple of years. Together with the big retail companies and the food industry such as canteens, we will have to think about whether the focus is just to keep business as usual – or if it is also about keeping the population healthy, and preserving the environment,” said Federico J. A. Perez-Cueto.
He states however that nudging is just one tool in the box.
“If you want people to eat enough vegetables, it is not the only thing to do, there is need for policies, recommendations, voluntary agreements, information campaigns, but nudging can contribute, and we think the contribution can be substantial,” he said.
The review also concludes that there is a need for high-quality studies that quantify the magnitude of positional effects on food choice in conjunction with measuring the impact on food intake, particularly in the longer term. Future studies should use outcome measures such as change in quantities of food consumed or energy intake to quantify the impact on dietary intake and the potential impact on nutrition-related health.
I have been writing this blog for more than six years. When I started I weighed more than I do now and hadn’t reached the level of health that I currently enjoy. It all came about through conscious decisions and actions. Clearly, it doesn’t work that way for everyone. We still have two out of three of us overweight and half of them are obese. Ditto, smoking. I don’t see how anyone who can read can continue to smoke, yet we have 175,000 people dying each year from this totally preventable cause. And, smoking damages every organ in your body.
So, some people make less than optimal choices when it comes to their health. Maybe a nudge in the right direction will help them out.